Blamely.ai Local-first

Know who wrote every line. AI or human.

Blamely AI helps engineering teams trace every line to a human or AI assistant with a local-first CLI, editor signals, git notes, and reports, then connect that attribution context with review, quality, delivery, and AI impact measurement in Oobeya.

ClaudeCursorCopilotCodexGeminiDevinOpenCode
blamely · tracking

PaymentService.ts

refs/notes/blamely

1import { Stripe } from 'stripe'you
2
3export class PaymentService {you
4 private stripe: Stripeyou
5
6 // charge a customer and record itclaude
7 async charge(amount: number) {claude
8 return await this.stripe.charges.create({ amount })claude
9 }claude
10
11 refund(id: string) {copilot
12 return this.stripe.refunds.create({ charge: id })copilot
13 }you
14}you

Commit attribution

68%

AI

32%

Human

Assistant mix

Claude4.2k tok
Copilot2 kept

No cloud. No account.

Attribution stays local, then travels with git notes when teams choose to push it.

Get Blamely AI and Oobeya integration details.

Leave your work email and we will send product access details as soon as they are available.

Blamely + Oobeya integration

See Blamely attribution context inside Oobeya

Blamely code-origin signals become more useful when local attribution, supported AI tools, git-native reports, token context, and AI share are connected with Oobeya insights, improvement areas, and team-level anomalies.

AI adoption, risks, and member anomalies

Oobeya turns Blamely attribution signals into clear good insights, areas to improve, and team-level anomaly signals such as AI usage and token cost outliers.

Click to enlarge

Attribution model

From Blamely code origin to engineering outcomes

AI attribution becomes useful when Blamely code-origin context, git notes, local reports, pull requests, code review, quality, and delivery metrics are connected instead of sitting in a separate usage report.

Code origin

Identify whether a line is human-authored, AI-assisted, or AI-generated before that context disappears inside the repository.

Git and pull request context

Connect Blamely git notes and attribution reports to commits, pull requests, repositories, files, review flow, code churn, and ownership patterns.

Engineering outcomes

Bring code-origin context into Oobeya AI Impact so teams can compare and correlate AI-assisted work with delivery, quality, review, and team outcomes.

Answer Engine Ready

Short answers for Blamely AI attribution questions

These are the questions engineering leaders, platform teams, and AI governance teams ask when they move from AI adoption to AI accountability with Blamely.

What is AI code attribution?

AI code attribution is the practice of identifying whether code was written by AI, a human, or a mixed workflow, then connecting that origin context to files, commits, pull requests, and engineering outcomes.

How can teams track AI-generated code?

Teams can track AI-generated code with Blamely AI by running a local CLI and editor workflow that records assistant activity, writes attribution into git notes, and produces reports across files, changes, tools, and repositories.

What is AI blame in software engineering?

AI blame is a governance-oriented view of code origin. Blamely AI uses that context to show where AI-assisted work contributed to a change without turning attribution into individual surveillance.

Can Git show whether code was written by AI or a human?

Git alone usually shows who committed code, not whether the code was human-authored, AI-assisted, or AI-generated. Blamely AI adds the code-origin layer that Git does not capture by itself.

Why does AI attribution matter for engineering leaders?

AI attribution helps leaders separate AI adoption from AI impact. Blamely AI shows where AI-assisted work appears so teams can investigate review, rework, quality, delivery, and governance patterns with better context.

How does Blamely AI work with Oobeya?

Blamely AI focuses on code-origin attribution. Oobeya connects that attribution context with AI Impact, delivery, review, quality, and team-level engineering intelligence.

Blamely + Oobeya metrics

Metrics that make Blamely attribution useful

The goal is not to label code for its own sake. The goal is to understand how AI-assisted development relates to delivery flow, quality, rework, cost, and team behavior.

MetricQuestion answeredProduct context
AI code shareWhat portion of work is AI-assisted or AI-generated?Blamely attribution reports
AI vs. human PR cycle timeDo AI-assisted changes move through review faster or slower?Oobeya AI Impact + PR analytics
AI code churnIs AI-generated code being rewritten, reverted, or deleted?Blamely + code churn
Review loadIs AI output increasing pressure on senior reviewers?Oobeya review analytics
Quality impactDoes AI-assisted work correlate with defects, failures, or security findings?Oobeya quality and delivery metrics
AI assistant cost contextDoes AI spend align with adoption, attribution, flow, quality, and delivery trends?Oobeya AI Impact + cost monitoring

Blamely AI + Oobeya

Connect Blamely attribution with Oobeya AI Impact

Blamely AI provides the code-origin layer. Oobeya connects that context with AI Impact, AI Insights, AI Chat, and engineering intelligence reporting.

Blamely AI

Evaluate AI-generated code with Blamely AI context

Schedule a focused walkthrough to see how Blamely AI and Oobeya connect local-first AI attribution, supported AI coding tools, Git, pull requests, code quality, and delivery outcomes.

Blamely AI FAQ

Questions about AI-generated code, AI blame, and Git AI attribution

Answers for teams evaluating how to detect, track, and govern AI-assisted software development.

Blamely AI identifies where AI-assisted or AI-generated work appears in the codebase. AI metrics tracking measures how that work affects adoption, review flow, quality, delivery, and productivity outcomes. Oobeya connects those outcomes through AI Impact.

Oobeya, Inc. @ 2026 2513 Shallowford Rd. #200 Suite 232, Marietta, GA 30066 USA