Run retrospectives with better evidence
Use recurring symptoms, review friction, rework loops, and blocked work patterns to focus retros on the highest-leverage team improvements.
For Agile Coaches
Bring delivery evidence into team conversations
Use flow, quality, and capacity signals to focus retrospectives. Help teams choose an improvement and track what changes over time.
What to look at
See the patterns behind recurring blockers
Combine team conversations with delivery evidence to understand where work waits, returns, or loses focus.
- Symptoms and recurring workflow friction
- Team-level metrics with DORA context
- Resource allocation and focus patterns
- AI coding assistant impact on delivery and quality
- Gamification goals for continuous improvement
- Retrospectives depend on incomplete signals
- Teams often discuss symptoms from memory, while review queues, rework, blocked work, and waiting time remain scattered across tools.
- Metrics can feel personal when context is missing
- Coaching improves faster when the conversation stays at team and system level instead of turning into individual tracking.
- AI-assisted work changes flow faster than rituals can adapt
- AI coding assistants can increase activity, but coaches still need to understand whether flow, quality, and team confidence are improving.
From signals to decisions
Give continuous improvement a clear starting point
Use team-level evidence to shape retrospectives, capacity discussions, and AI adoption experiments.
Keep metrics team-level and actionable
Discuss cycle time, lead time, throughput, quality, and DORA-aligned delivery signals as system feedback rather than individual performance tracking.
Coach capacity and focus with allocation insight
Use resource allocation visibility to understand where team effort is going, where focus is fragmented, and where planning conversations need more clarity.
Guide AI adoption without losing team trust
Evaluate whether AI coding assistant usage is improving flow and quality while keeping the conversation focused on outcomes, not micromanagement.
Customer perspectives
Engineering evidence teams can act on
“According to our POC evaluations around IT productivity measurement, Oobeya was the tool that best met our expectations. Its integration flexibility, Symptoms capability, and DORA metrics gave us visibility across nearly 4,000 developers and helped us clearly see inefficient points, including outsourced projects.”
Turkcell · Telecommunications
“Oobeya provides a comprehensive overview of our SDLC. We can see a wide range of metrics crucial for engineering efficiency by collecting data from different sources like version control, issue management, and deployment tools.”
Invicti · Cybersecurity
“What stands out the most with Oobeya is its depth of analysis and insights. It provides automated recommendations based on our team's activity, and the integration with tools like Azure DevOps and SonarQube makes the transition seamless.”
TEB (BNP Paribas) · Banking
How does Oobeya help Agile coaches?
Bring team-level delivery flow, quality, capacity, and recurring workflow symptoms into coaching and improvement conversations.
Can we use it in retrospectives?
Yes. Review waiting time, rework, blocked work, and review delays to choose a focused improvement and follow its progress.
Can coaching stay focused on teams and systems?
Yes. Use team-level metrics as a starting point for conversations about workflow and constraints. Interpret the data together with the team.
Where do DORA metrics fit?
Use DORA metrics alongside workflow and quality context to discuss delivery performance and follow changes over time.
How does Resource Allocation help coaching?
See where team effort goes and where focus is fragmented to support planning and capacity discussions.
Can we discuss AI coding assistant impact?
Yes. Compare AI adoption with delivery, review, and quality trends to help teams evaluate their working practices.
Can gamification support improvement goals?
Use leagues and selected engineering KPIs to support improvement initiatives. Choose goals that fit the team’s context.
What should we bring to a coaching walkthrough?
Bring your team structure, current improvement goals, and recurring delivery concerns. We can focus the walkthrough on those questions.
See Oobeya in practice
Start with your team’s improvement goals
Explore how delivery symptoms, team-level metrics, and capacity signals can support your coaching practice.